Options And Comparison
What Kinds Of Vector Databases Exist?
Vector search now appears in search engines, relational databases, in-memory stores, graph engines, and object storage. Each family started from a different job and added vector support on top, so each one is strongest where that original job overlaps with yours.
| Family | Started as | Typical strength |
|---|---|---|
| Managed search service | Enterprise search | Quick setup, ready-made connectors and language understanding |
| Search engine cluster | Distributed search and analytics | Full-text search and vector search in one place, high query rates |
| Relational database with a vector extension | SQL database | Vectors and relational data queried together, ACID transactions |
| Document database | JSON document store | Flexible documents next to vector search, familiar APIs |
| In-memory database | Cache and key-value store | Very low latency for real-time workloads |
| Graph engine | Graph analytics | Vector search combined with relationship traversal |
| Object-storage-native vector store | Object storage | Large collections at low cost, no cluster to manage |
| Managed knowledge base | RAG platform | Ingestion, chunking, embedding, and retrieval handled for you |
AIOZ Storage belongs to the object-storage-native family. It keeps vectors in the storage layer and speaks the AWS S3 Vectors API.
How Does An Object-Storage-Native Store Differ?
Most vector databases run as a cluster or an instance that you provision, size, and pay for while it sits idle. An object-storage-native store works the other way around. Vectors live in storage like any other data, and you interact with them through an API. There is nothing to provision before your first write.
That design suits collections that grow large, are queried at a steady but modest rate, and need to be kept for a long time, such as document archives, knowledge bases, and agent memory. It is less suited to workloads that need the lowest possible response time on every request.
How Do The Families Compare?
| Object-storage-native (AIOZ Storage) | Search engine cluster | Relational with vector extension | In-memory database | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | Storage layer with a vector API | Distributed cluster | Database server | Memory-resident database |
| Scaling | Grows with the storage layer, no capacity planning | Add nodes and rebalance | Bigger instance or read replicas | Bigger nodes and replicas |
| Setup | Create a bucket and an index | Size and configure a cluster | Install and tune an extension | Size and configure nodes |
| Team skills | S3 and basic vector concepts | Search engine operations | SQL and PostgreSQL | Redis-style operations |
| Programming model | S3 Vectors API and SDKs | REST and query DSL | SQL | Key-value commands |
| Best fit | Large, long-lived collections and RAG | High-frequency search with full-text | Mixed SQL and vector queries | Real-time, ultra-low-latency lookups |
AIOZ Storage supports float32 vectors, a distance metric chosen per index, metadata stored with each vector, and top-K similarity queries. It provides SDKs for Python, JavaScript, and Go, plus an MCP server for AI assistants. It does not provide SQL, full-text search, or graph traversal.
When Should You Choose Something Else?
AIOZ Storage is not the best choice for every workload.
- If you need single-digit-millisecond responses on every request, an in-memory database is built for that.
- If you want keyword search and vector search in the same query, a search engine cluster combines both.
- If your vectors must be joined with relational tables in one transaction, a relational database with a vector extension keeps them together.
- If your data is a knowledge graph and relationships matter as much as similarity, a graph engine fits better.
When Does AIOZ Storage Fit Well?
- You already use S3-compatible tools and want vectors without adopting a new database and a new query language.
- Your collection is large or growing and you want storage-style economics instead of paying for a cluster around the clock.
- Your access pattern is retrieval for RAG, semantic search, or agent memory, where a well-ranked result matters more than shaving the last few milliseconds.
- You want to keep embeddings on the same platform as the source files they were made from.
- You need replication and availability without operating them yourself, which the AIOZ DePIN network provides by default through replication.
A common setup uses both kinds of store. A fast, expensive store holds the vectors queried constantly, and an object-storage-native store holds the long tail. AIOZ Storage works well as that second tier.
Build Your Own Pipeline Or Use A Managed One?
| Consideration | Run the pipeline yourself | Use a managed knowledge base |
|---|---|---|
| Control | Full control over chunking, embedding, and retrieval | Standard patterns handled for you |
| Time to first result | Longer, you build each step | Shorter, one service does it all |
| Team focus | Data and retrieval engineering | Application logic |
| Flexibility | Swap any model or component | Bound to what the service supports |
With AIOZ Storage you choose your own embedding model and your own retrieval logic, which is the first column. If you would rather not build the embedding step at all, Super Intelligence Memory lets you save and recall plain-language statements without creating embeddings or indexes yourself.
Where To Go Next
- Cost, Use Cases And Next Steps explains what drives vector database cost and where teams apply vectors.
- Vectors And Vector Databases covers the fundamentals if you skipped them.
See Also
- S3 Compatibility - why S3-compatible tools work with AIOZ Storage.
- MCP Server - work with vector buckets from an AI assistant.
- Vector Database Python SDK - start with the Python SDK.